Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 10 results ...

Şevik, S, Koçer, A, İnce, H and Tombuş, F E (2022) Determination of optimum tilt angle of the solar collector and evaluation of the position of the existing buildings in terms of solar potential. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 812–28.

Engebø, A, Klakegg, O J, Lohne, J, Bohne, R A, Fyhn, H and Lædre, O (2022) High-performance building projects: how to build trust in the team. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 774–90.

Globa, A, Costin, G, Tokede, O, Wang, R, Khoo, C K and Moloney, J (2022) Hybrid kinetic facade: fabrication and feasibility evaluation of full-scale prototypes. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 791–811.

Goncikowski, M (2022) The tactics of illumination of high-rise buildings in the cities skyline. Research by design on Skyreach tower skyscraper in Warsaw. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 870–93.

Maleki, B, Casanovas-Rubio, M d M and Fuente Antequera, A d l (2022) Sustainability assessment in residential high-rise building design: state of the art. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 927–40.

Mangkuto, R A and Paramita, B (2022) Computation of the greenery-sky-view factor in daylit buildings. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 850–69.

Sadooghi, P and Kherani, N P (2022) Influence of metallo-dielectric optical properties on thermal resistance and solar heat gain coefficient of multi-pane glazing systems in hot and cold climates. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 894–910.

Singer, H and Özşahin, & (2022) Prioritization of laminate flooring selection criteria from experts’ perspectives: a spherical fuzzy AHP-based model. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 911–26.

Valitabar, M, GhaffarianHoseini, A, GhaffarianHoseini, A and Attia, S (2022) Advanced control strategy to maximize view and control discomforting glare: a complex adaptive façade. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 829–49.

Zami, M S (2022) Barriers hindering acceptance of earth construction in the urban context of the United Kingdom. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(06), 941–58.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Barriers; hinder; earth construction; urban; acceptability; environmental sustainability;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 1745-2007
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2021.1995314
  • Abstract:
    Earth material is environmentally more sustainable than traditional building materials, such as bricks and blocks. The benefits of earth construction are multiple, especially with regard to the uniqueness as a way of preserving the artisanship and cultural values of architectural heritage. Unfortunately, construction professionals in the United Kingdom are unfamiliar with many aspects of earthen architecture. A number of interrelated barriers inhibit the acceptance of earth-based material and make it an unpopular choice among construction professionals in the UK. The aim of this study is to develop an understanding of such barriers by identifying and analysing them in light of perceptions held across societies, cultures, and acceptability among professionals. To get to the aim, an interpretivist philosophical stance was taken in this research and a critical analysis of up-to-date literature on various barriers was carried out. The Delphi technique and in-depth interviews were then overseen to substantiate which barriers hindering the acceptability of earth-based material in UK urban construction. A series of interconnected barriers such as, absence of supply chain networks, prejudicial conflict, reticence to changing familiar methods of construction as well as lack of knowledge, skill, and training were identified by experts as the key factors hindering the acceptability of earth-based construction material in the UK.